The sale, modification, reproduction, and distribution of PaperRater's content belongs solely to paperRater. Please contact us at if you would like authorization to use our content. Submitted Content, you keep ownership of any intellectual property rights, such as copyright, that you have in the content you submit to paperRater for review. This content will only be used in accordance with our. To the extent permitted by law, this license continues even after you stop using PaperRater. Please do not submit any content that infringes on the intellectual property rights of another. Likewise, any unlawful, abusive, defamatory, harassing, obscene, or otherwise objectionable content is prohibited.
Admissions financial Aid central georgia technical College
The easier one to achieve is: (1) this result is new, and doesn't follow simply from anything previous. The much harder one is, (2) this technique is fundamentally new and produces interesting results. If the results plan are interesting, most journals are happy to publish articles of type (1). Articles of type (2) are much rarer, and can potentially open entire new fields. Tl;dnr: Preparation : you need to either know the subarea well or be willing to read a lot to learn about. Originality : What papers does it draw on? How likely is it that a reader of those would be able to write this paper?
Generally, these are extending my results. Typically, i ask myself: What does this paper add? Is it something I would have thought of easily or not? If yes, why didn't i include it in my paper? In contrast, i've also reviewed some papers that I was not well prepared for. They were in my general field, but in a subarea that I hadn't worked. These papers took a lot more work. up to 10x as long for me to review as a paper in an area where i'm very familiar.) For papers in an area that's new to me, i often have to look up (and skim) at least a few of the references from the. Originality has at least two very different levels.
Stage review: Redemption is well produced, but lacking
Handling allegations of plagiarism Emerald seeks to uphold academic integrity and homework to protect authors' moral rights. We take all cases of plagiarism very seriously. Emerald is also aware of the potential impact an allegation of plagiarism can have on a researcher's career. Therefore, we have procedures in place to deal with alleged cases of plagiarism. In order for us to take an unbiased approach, we investigate each case thoroughly, seeking clarification from all affected parties. Emerald was the first academic publisher to adopt the iparadigms software (iThenticate) to help inform us when an alleged case of plagiarism is brought to our attention. If we are approached by a third party with an allegation of plagiarism, we would always seek a response from the original author(s) or copyright holder(s) before we decide on a course of action.
We will not be influenced by other parties and will form our decisions in an unbiased and objective manner. Emerald is not obliged to discuss individual cases of alleged plagiarism with third parties. Emerald reserves the right not to proceed with a case if the complainant presents a false name or affiliation or acts in an inappropriate or threatening manner towards Emerald editors and staff. If you are concerned about plagiarism or want to know more about Emerald's approach to handling allegations of misconduct, please contact. I've reviewed more than 50 papers, and my preparation to review them has varied widely. At least a few of them have drawn heavily on papers i've written.
In feminine societies, the dominant values are caring for others, and people and warm relationships are important. If no author is given, use 'anon'. At the end of the paper a reference list in alphabetical order should be supplied: For books: surname, initials, (year title of book, publisher, place of publication,. (2001 competing Strategies, outhouse Press, rochester. For book chapters: surname, initials, (year "chapter title editor's surname, initials, title of book, publisher, place of publication, pages,. (1999 "Marketing for the production manager in levicki,.
taking the Blinkers off Managers, broom Relm, london,.29-33. For journals: surname, initials, (year "title of article journal name, volume, number, pages,. (2000 "Empowered to serve management Decision, vol. Treat conference proceedings in the same way that you would a journal article, but insert the full conference title and dates where the journal title would normally appear. For websites: surname, initials (year "title of cited work available at: website link (accessed on appropriate date. (2004 "Managerial roles and coping responses available at sponses/ (accessed 29th June 2005). If an author name is not given, begin with the title of the cited work.
A, thousand, splendid, suns, summary sample
References to other publications must be in Harvard style for Emerald journals. All references should be carefully checked for completeness, accuracy and consistency. You should include all author names and initials and give any journal title in full. When referring to ideas or research by another author, you should cite publications in the thesis text using the first named author's name in one of salon two ways: The value of individualism emphasizes an 'i' orientation (Wheeler, 2002). Or Wheeler (2002) states that the value of individualism emphasizes an 'i' orientation. When copying part of a sentence verbatim, always use"tion marks and correctly cite the original author. For example: Wheeler (2002) states that "the value of individualism emphasizes an 'i' orientation" When copying a section of text verbatim, always indent the paragraph. For example: Wheeler (2002) asserts that: Masculinity/femininity is another important value that relates to differences between cultures. In strongly masculine societies, the dominant values in society are material success and progress, and men are supposed to be assertive, ambitious, and tough.
If elements of a work have been previously published in another publication, including an Emerald publication, the author is required to acknowledge the earlier work and indicate how the subsequent work differs and builds upon the research and conclusions contained in the previous work. Verbatim copying of an author's own work and paraphrasing is not acceptable and we recommend that research should only be reused to support new conclusions. We recommend that authors cite all previous stages of publication and presentation of their ideas that have culminated in the final work, including conference papers, workshop presentations and listserv communications. This will ensure that a complete record of all communication relating to the work is documented. Republication of original work, original work is published in Emerald journals with a small number of exceptions only. These exceptions include conference papers, archival papers that are republished in an anniversary or commemorative issue, papers that are of particular merit and that have received only limited circulation (for example through a company newsletter). These papers are republished at the discretion of the editor. The original work is fully and correctly attributed and permission from the appropriate copyright holder obtained. Attributions will be added to archive content that has been found to have been republished in an Emerald journal in the past.
this policy does not apply to any work that has been included in a conference proceeding volume or publication which has been assigned an issn or isbn. In these instances, please contact prior to submission. The following types of ethical misconduct should be avoided: Verbatim copying, verbatim copying of more than 10 per cent (or a significant passage or section of text) of another person's work without acknowledgement, references or the use of"tion marks. Paraphrasing, improper paraphrasing of another person's work is where more than one sentence within a paragraph or section of text has been changed or sentences have been rearranged without appropriate attribution. Significant improper paraphrasing (more than 10 per cent of a work) without appropriate attribution is treated as seriously as verbatim copying. Re-using parts of a work without attribution. Re-use of elements of another person's work, for example a figure, table or paragraph without acknowledgement, references or the use of"tion marks. It is incumbent on the author to obtain the necessary permission to reuse elements of another person's work from the copyright holder. Self plagiarism, emerald requires that all authors sign a copyright form that clearly states that their submitted work has not been published before.
If the submitted article is accepted for publication, Emerald would expect guaranteed the preprint to be amended to state This is an author-created, un-copyedited version of an article accepted for publication in insert name of journal. Upon publication, the preprint should be amended to include the digital Object Identifier (DOI) to direct the reader to the version of record, hosted. Over the course of a researchers career, Emerald understands that working papers and conference papers will be submitted, and occasionally hosted online. The existence of a conference paper on a conference website or the presentation of a paper at a conference does not disqualify the paper from being considered for publication. Additionally, emerald would not expect a conference paper to be removed from a conference website. Authors must be aware that very rarely are conference papers journal-ready, and should expect to further develop their paper prior to submission. However, this policy is only applicable if: the author declares to the Emerald editor on submission of their article that a conference paper upon which the paper is based is publicly available; the submitted article is substantially developed from the conference paper, be it with. X, hosted on,.; authors should not assign copyright when presenting their work at a conference.
How to, improve your Memory: Tips and Exercises
Home for Authors writing for Emerald originality guidelines, it is Emerald's editorial policy to welcome submissions for consideration which are original and not under consideration for any other publication at the same time. All authors should be aware of the importance of presenting content that is based on their own research and expressed in their own words. As part of the Emerald Copyright Policy, we have prepared these guidelines to assist authors in understanding acceptable and unacceptable practice. Our approach is specifically aimed at promoting and protecting authors' work. Emeralds preprints policy, emerald does not consider the upload of a preprint to a preprint server prior publication, and would not request its removal. However, this policy is only applicable if: The author declares to the Emerald editor on submission of their article that a preprint is hosted on a preprint server; The author has not assigned copyright to the pre-print server. Where possible, emerald will take steps to minimize the impact upon the anonymity of the double blind peer review, such as asking editors to strike out any reference to a preprint before sending business the paper out to review.